In May, the publishing house Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment And the Chinese studio Virtuos Games announced Batman: Return to Arkham – reprint Batman: Arkham asylum And Batman: Arkham City for the consoles of the last generation. However, apparently, the development process went somewhere wrong.
Batman: Return to Arkham should have appeared on the shelves on July 26, but the collection will miss this date. Warner Bros. I decided that developers from Virtuos It takes extra time for grinding all fresh "expirins" that are planned in a reprint. Unfortunately, the company cannot currently name the new release date.
Probably, the Chinese are not able to cope with the engine, which they promised in Return To Arkham: versions for PlayStation 4 and Xbox One work on Unreal Engine 4, while original Arkham asylum And Arkham City were on Unreal Engine 3.
June 27, 2016 not, Bethesda does not make The Elder Scrolls 6 at all
June 28, 2016 The TechNomacancer trial trailer calls to determine the fate of Mars
Batman: Return to Arkham
The best comments
For WB, this is the norm, hire crooked boobs, and then transfer, cancel or release in the form of a trash and look for excuses with the extreme, on which you can dump everything.
Yes, they did not decide to transfer the super-duper ending the trilogy about Betman to finish everything, but the fucking (I have nothing against these games) reprints they transfer.
Yeah, study. Therefore, they www.madcasino-online.co.uk/ are not released on RS. And on the consoles the game originally worked normally (the knight of Arkham.)
Now they understand this – they study by mistakes. And the chosen studio like decent. I think it is not expected.
I exaggerated. And yes, the game is good, but such a port is just a mockery and disrespect for its players.
And where is infa that this studio is crooked -handed boobs? It seems that good ports make, everything is fine in the same Heavy Rain.
Well, if if they are not blind incompetent monkeys-DCPSHNI, then they could notice that by the last date of the release their game on the stove almost does not work for most players. And if you also take into account all these transfers, then the question even somehow disappears itself
I agree, but thirty FPS and pixel videos in Heavy Rain Rain Remastered I would not call the word "normal".
Yes, I would not call them dtspshnikov (by the way, cerebral palsy does not affect the intellect), because the WB has long established itself as a publishing house to just do not care about PC. It’s one thing to do crookedly, but to do it (Dark Souls), and another thing to “saw” the port on **. So I would not hope for improving situations ..
What millions?) Ale, uncle) for pitch there are no such sales in most games, and those that have a good multiplayer part. And millions who bought the game on the consoles got an excellent game. But Remaster, by the way, does not go to the PC at all.
Batman: Arkham Knight release date was scheduled for October 14, 2014 [36]. On pre -order it was possible to get Harley Quinn as a playable character, with their own skills, various types of weapons and devices. The buyer also received 4 exclusive cards in testing mode [41].
On June 3, the developers announced the postponement of the release date for 2015.
On September 8, 2014, the developers announced the release date – June 2, 2015.
On March 4, 2015, it became known that the game was planned on Linux/Steamos. The release was scheduled for autumn 2015.
March 23, 2015 developers announced the new and last postponement of the release date of the game on June 23, 2015.
I never asked about it! No, well, seriously, I already prepared to re -pass both parts in full, but they break me off like that. I hope that they will spend time with benefit, and optimize everything as they should.
No, I mean not to transfer it when millions of people have already bought already back and cried from the quality of the port, and then when the game has not yet come out, so that it is ready for work for work one hundred percent.
Well, yes, even though he was withdrawn from sale, supposedly to correct the shortcomings of the PC version, this in the end did not help directly at all. I personally checked myself.
Comment (0)